<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decrease in Twitter followers - suspended accounts removed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://workforprofit.net/decrease-in-twitter-followers-suspended-accounts-removed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://workforprofit.net/decrease-in-twitter-followers-suspended-accounts-removed/</link>
	<description>Uncovering Ways to Make Money with Automated Forex Trading Systems - Work for Profit.net</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Not always</title>
		<link>http://workforprofit.net/decrease-in-twitter-followers-suspended-accounts-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Not always</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workforprofit.net/?p=497#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I created several Twitter accounts, for several different online activitiesI have, and Twitter suspended these accounts before I could post anything more than Merry Christmas to a few of my clients

The reason? I might possibly be thinking of using those accounts as spam. There was no evidence of spam, and I begged customer service to reconsider, but I was finally told on another online support site that my account would probably not be restated. Nice, huh? I think this is one of those cases where they may be hatcheting legitimate users, and it makes me unlikely to use the service even if restated, as there seem to be far too many reasons (per the customer service rep himself) why an account could be flagged as suspicious or 'anti-social'. No thanks...I wouldn't risk building up a large community on such a service, only to be cut off from access to the service for violating TOS that are not clearly stated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I created several Twitter accounts, for several different online activitiesI have, and Twitter suspended these accounts before I could post anything more than Merry Christmas to a few of my clients</p>
<p>The reason? I might possibly be thinking of using those accounts as spam. There was no evidence of spam, and I begged customer service to reconsider, but I was finally told on another online support site that my account would probably not be restated. Nice, huh? I think this is one of those cases where they may be hatcheting legitimate users, and it makes me unlikely to use the service even if restated, as there seem to be far too many reasons (per the customer service rep himself) why an account could be flagged as suspicious or &#8216;anti-social&#8217;. No thanks&#8230;I wouldn&#8217;t risk building up a large community on such a service, only to be cut off from access to the service for violating TOS that are not clearly stated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forex Trading Systems</title>
		<link>http://workforprofit.net/decrease-in-twitter-followers-suspended-accounts-removed/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Forex Trading Systems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workforprofit.net/?p=497#comment-85</guid>
		<description>This is a good thing as suspended accounts were mostly spam with messages sent out promoting pornography sites and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good thing as suspended accounts were mostly spam with messages sent out promoting pornography sites and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

